E-mail : sales@xhanco.com
Téléphone : +8619129236778
An airline meal pack is an assembly, not just a tray. It may pass through portioning, chilled holding, transport, trolley loading, reheating, service and collection. Each step can expose a different weakness: a lid that lifts after condensation, a paper box that softens, a tray that binds in a cart, or an attractive print finish that lacks the right food-contact documentation. The purchasing task is to convert that route into an airline meal tray packaging specification that both caterer and manufacturer can test.
XHANCO offers aluminum foil containers, printed paper meal boxes and bagasse trays within its airline meal tray range. These are candidates for different service models, not interchangeable “airline approved” formats. The following workflow is designed for purchasing teams that need comparable samples, a defensible evidence file and repeatable OEM production.
Begin with the food, not a material preference. Record portion mass, liquid content, fat level and whether acidic components touch the container. Add the fill temperature, storage time, chilled or frozen hold, transport vibration, reheating equipment and service temperature. A cold snack pack and an oven-heated hot meal have different failure modes. Specify whether the lid stays on during heating, whether the container sits inside another tray, and whether the crew handles it with gloves.
For US-bound food-contact applications, the US Food and Drug Administration's food types and conditions-of-use tables distinguish applications such as refrigerated storage and reheating in the container. They are useful for framing a supplier's intended-use statement. They do not turn a generic “food-grade” claim into a product authorization. The FDA explains that the regulatory status of a finished food-contact article depends on its components and their applicable use limitations in its component-status guidance.
| Candidate format | Published XHANCO example | Trial questions |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum foil hot-meal container | Model 380-23: 159 × 102 × 30 mm; 0.085 mm foil | Does the exact rim and lid seal reliably? Does the filled assembly fit the heating equipment and airline tray? Validate the actual heating cycle; never assume microwave suitability. |
| Printed paper meal box | Large paper box: 300 g coated board; 240 × 150 × 50 mm | Does the coating and crease pattern withstand the intended food, humidity, stacking and storage period? What touches the food, and where is the print? |
| Molded fiber compartment tray | Four-compartment bagasse tray: 220 × 190 mm listed format | Do compartment volumes, lid fit, oil/water resistance and handling performance match the meal? Are food-contact and disposal claims supported for the exact supplied construction? |
The dimensions above come from current XHANCO product pages. They are catalogue starting points, not universal aircraft, trolley or regulatory standards. The buyer should confirm the current drawing and quote, especially if a custom lid, coating or inner liner changes the assembly.
Request production-representative units from the proposed line and material sources. Fill them with the real menu or an agreed test medium. Trial the full sequence: loading, chilled storage, cart insertion, transport simulation, any heating step, service opening and waste collection. Measure the outer dimensions and usable fill volume, not just the nominal mould size. Record the cart and oven model, time-temperature cycle, number of packs, sampling lot and pass/fail criteria.
Useful failure criteria include lid peel or lift, liquid leakage, grease strike-through, deformed rims, broken hinges, print scuffing, nesting jams and insufficient grip after heating. Stack the filled packs at the actual cart height; a container that passes a bench-top leak test may fail under the load of the stack. Ask the caterer to identify the acceptable failure rate and who will sign the trial report. Photographs are useful, but retained failed samples and measured results are better evidence.
For custom printed airline paper meal boxes, put the dieline, crease position, print safe area, brand colours, coating side and permitted food-contact areas in one controlled drawing. A digital proof checks artwork, not moisture resistance or fold behaviour. Approve a physical sample from representative board and printing. If the insert or outer sleeve changes, review the entire packing sequence again.
For EU-bound packs, the European Commission states that all food-contact materials placed on the EU market must meet Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 and be manufactured under Regulation (EC) No 2023/2006 on good manufacturing practice. Material-specific EU or national provisions may also apply. The Commission overview is the starting point, while the legal texts define the obligations. Ask for evidence tied to the specific tray, coating, print, adhesive and lid, the intended food and contact conditions, and the actual producer. A certificate for a base resin or a different construction is not enough.
US programmes need a separate component-by-component review under the applicable FDA framework. A buyer should ask who made the contact layer and which authorization or other legal basis applies to the intended use. The FDA notes that a food-contact notification is effective for the named manufacturer or supplier and its stated conditions of use; it is not a blanket approval for identical material from every source. Record the document revision and change-control trigger in the purchase specification.
Environmental language also needs scope. A bagasse meal tray for inflight catering may have an attractive fiber story, but material identity does not prove industrial compostability of a coated final tray or access to a composting route after an international flight. IATA's sustainable-cabin guidance identifies catering waste as a mix of food, beverages and packaging and notes that international catering waste can face special restrictions. Involve the airline's waste team before specifying an end-of-life claim on the box.
The technical agreement should identify the approved sample revision, drawing, layer or board specification, dimensions and tolerances, colour reference, lid or closure, packing quantity, carton marks and lot code. Define incoming checks, in-process sampling, finished-pack tests and pre-shipment release records. XHANCO's published four-stage QC process offers a structure for discussing these records; the buyer should agree the specific methods and acceptance limits for the ordered SKU.
For multi-market orders, use a matrix instead of one broad claim. One row per destination can identify the approved food and contact conditions, required documents, language or marking, and the waste route. A change from a foil container to coated board, or from a cold snack to a reheated meal, should trigger a fresh assessment. The same applies to a new lid supplier, print ink or adhesive.
Before tender award, ask a simple question: can the factory reproduce the tested assembly on a second lot? Place a pilot order with the real packing configuration, then compare dimensions, fit, sealing, appearance and document identity against the signed sample. This costs less than discovering a mismatch across a full airline catering network. Send the menu and process map, proposed dimensions, equipment details, route markets, artwork and forecast through XHANCO's contact page to discuss a sample and quotation.
Illustrative cover photograph: meal preparation by Richard R via Unsplash, cropped to 16:9 under the Unsplash License. It does not depict XHANCO manufacturing, a XHANCO product or an airline customer.
XHANCO developed two custom films for Guangzhou Nanlian Air Catering Co., Ltd. The published project records the following test conditions and outcomes.
Read the complete development and supply case | Use the packaging trial worksheet
Laissez un message
Scannez vers WeChat :
Scannez vers WhatsApp :